---

All the problems in forex short-term trading,
Have answers here!
All the troubles in forex long-term investment,
Have echoes here!
All the psychological doubts in forex investment,
Have empathy here!

---

In the context of two-way forex trading, market participants generally do not share the material consumption aspirations typical of the general public. Their core trading objectives and psychological goals focus consistently on accumulating principal and expanding trading capital—a mindset prevalent in the field. Fundamentally, this approach is rooted in the continuous creation of incremental value within the market, rather than the depletion or overdrawing of existing assets.

---

For investors in the two-way forex market, a significant floating loss in their account often triggers a radical shift in personal consumption habits; many traders voluntarily curtail various material expenses, sometimes adopting an extremely frugal lifestyle. The root cause of this behavioral change is the persistent anxiety over capital erosion—driven by the floating loss—which dominates their trading mindset.
Forex markets are volatile, and returns are highly uncertain; traders cannot predict future profits, losses, or the upper limits of their earnings. It is precisely this market uncertainty that makes extreme frugality a vital source of psychological security for traders facing losses. Prioritizing the stability and controllability of their trading capital over external experiences like material indulgence or lifestyle luxuries, they readily embrace a simple, unpretentious lifestyle. Curbing material desires helps them maintain a steady trading mindset and achieve a sense of calm and stability in their lives. Another key driver for this long-term restraint is the goal of deeply engaging with the market to achieve substantial asset appreciation through trading. This deeply held vision motivates traders to willingly defer immediate material consumption, focusing all their energy and capital reserves on realizing long-term trading objectives, firmly believing that the value realized from a significant leap in asset growth far outweighs the appeal of immediate gratification.
Seasoned forex traders who consistently achieve stable profits often share a distinct subconscious realization: any funds spent on non-essential consumption are effectively removed from the trading ecosystem. Such funds can no longer generate compound returns through market activity, representing an irreversible loss of capital value. This mindset aligns perfectly with the core logic of value investing. Such traders do not lack the means for consumption or an appreciation for the good life; rather, they make deliberate choices and plan rationally. They channel every penny saved through daily frugality into trading capital, continuously adding to their market positions to amplify long-term compound returns.
Extending from trading psychology to the essence of life, the tempering experiences of the investment market foster a profound understanding of life itself. True happiness is not contingent upon the size of one's wealth or defined by one's status as rich or poor; ultimately, it stems from inner contentment and clarity. The process of deeply engaging in forex trading is also a journey of shedding material attachments and cultivating one's inner self. A diminishing desire for material possessions naturally gives rise to a minimalist lifestyle—an inevitable psychological outcome of long-term trading. Stripping away material superficiality, holding fast to a minimalist core, and facing both trading and life with composure and contentment—this state of serene peace represents the ideal way for a trader to live and exist.

In the two-way trading environment of the forex market, the steadfastness to hold a position serves as the critical dividing line between amateur and professional traders.

---

Truly mature traders understand that once the market direction is correctly identified and a position established, a fatal mistake is to rush to close the trade and lock in profits immediately after a key price level is breached—all while fantasizing about re-entering at a lower cost following a retracement. This seemingly astute logic is actually built upon a dangerous illusion: the belief that one can precisely predict daily or even hourly market highs and lows. In reality, short-term price movements in the forex market are inherently random, and intraday fluctuations often lack discernible patterns. Any attempt to pinpoint every single swing's turning point inevitably leads to the trap of over-trading.
Even more perilous is the habit of taking profits the moment a trend extends slightly; this practice causes a trader's mindset to unravel completely when faced with a genuine, accelerating market move. Once the market enters a phase of strong, one-sided momentum, prices often surge or plummet rapidly—squeezing out shorts or chasing down longs—without offering any meaningful opportunities for a retracement. At this point, traders who exited prematurely—eagerly awaiting a pullback to re-enter—can only watch anxiously as the market moves further away, eventually forcing them to chase the rally at higher prices or sell into the decline at lower prices just to get back in. This back-and-forth process significantly inflates the cost basis and erodes potential trend profits, often leading to accumulated losses from repeated attempts to chase the move. In a trending market, the steepest price to pay is not getting the direction wrong; rather, it is missing out on the entire move due to frequent position switching, even when the initial direction was correct.
The essence of trend-based profit lies in holding a position through the entire extended wave, not in obsessing over fragmented, short-term price fluctuations. In forex trading, trends often unfold over weeks or even months; every acceleration and consolidation phase along the way is an integral part of the trend's continuation. As long as the price remains consistently above or below the moving average system, the trend line holds firm, and key support or resistance levels remain unbroken, there is no reason for a trader to waver in their conviction. Frequent trading not only incurs constant spreads and commissions but, more critically, breeds the psychological anxiety of missing out—after closing a position for a meager gain, the market often surges ahead without you, making it incredibly difficult to regain your original entry point and mindset.
Of course, markets do not always trend. When the market enters a range-bound phase without a clear direction—fluctuating between upper and lower boundaries and lacking breakout momentum—traders can scale back their positions. They might adopt a swing-trading approach, selling high and buying low within the range to capitalize on the market's oscillation for short-term gains. However, once a clear, strong directional trend emerges, any "cleverness" rooted in short-term thinking must give way to the wisdom of holding the position. The only correct strategy at this stage is to let go of the obsession with every penny of fluctuation and prioritize holding the position, considering an exit only when the trend structure is fundamentally compromised or key price levels are decisively breached.
Ultimately, the logic of profitability in forex trading lies in letting profits run, not in trying to prove oneself right with every fluctuation. When a trend is firmly in play, doing less often yields greater returns; holding one's position is the key to substantial success. Those who constantly attempt to capture every incremental price fluctuation often end up losing out on the massive profits that were rightfully within their grasp. True professional traders understand the importance of taking the right action at the right time: holding the position as long as the trend remains intact, and exiting decisively once a breakout or breakdown is confirmed. This steadfast discipline is the fundamental basis for navigating market cycles—whether bull or bear—and achieving consistent, long-term profitability.

From the perspective of the two-way trading inherent in forex investment, the fact that Chinese traders have largely steered clear of stock market investment has, in effect, allowed them to avoid the structural risks specific to that market.

---

The Chinese A-share market emerged in the 1990s with the primary objective of serving the real economy and helping state-owned enterprises (SOEs) overcome financial distress and secure necessary funding. At the time, SOEs were widely grappling with high debt loads and operational difficulties; the capital market was explicitly positioned as a platform for direct financing, intended to replenish corporate capital, alleviate debt burdens, and support regional development. This top-level design imbued the A-share market with an inherent bias toward financing and the interests of the corporate sector; early institutional frameworks and regulatory priorities focused on safeguarding financing functions, while investor protection mechanisms were introduced only as supplementary measures that were gradually refined over time. In contrast, the US stock market originated from spontaneous private trading demand, evolving from early over-the-counter (OTC) transactions and broker-facilitated deals—meaning the market structure took shape before the regulatory rules did. Subsequent waves of misconduct—such as financial fraud, market manipulation, and deceptive practices—compelled regulators to establish rules and oversight bodies. The core objective was to curb malpractice, protect retail investors, and uphold market integrity; consequently, the institutional framework was designed from the outset to constrain listed companies and ensure fair trading. In short, the A-share market prioritizes financing, whereas the US market is fundamentally driven by fair trading and market integrity; a distinct genetic difference exists between the two.
It is not the case that China offers "no investor protection whatsoever"; rather, the protection mechanisms started late, and the process of refining them has been gradual. In recent years, A-share regulations have been playing catch-up; the implementation of the registration-based IPO system and stricter delisting rules have accelerated the clearing out of "junk" stocks and those involved in fraud. Mechanisms such as collective litigation, advance compensation, and whistleblower rewards have been gradually established, intensifying the crackdown on financial fraud and insider trading. Accountability for intermediaries and actual controllers has been reinforced, significantly raising the cost of misconduct for listed companies. However, given the market's short history and accumulated legacy issues—deep-seated problems built up over decades cannot be eradicated overnight—retail investors remain vulnerable to pitfalls and losses. This is an objective reality, yet it certainly does not amount to a "total lack of protection." Conversely, the US stock market is by no means designed "purely to serve retail investors"; it is fundamentally a arena for capital competition, dominated by institutions with a low proportion of retail participation. Its investor protection measures are essentially aimed at upholding the credibility of the entire capital market; only when retail investors and external capital are willing to enter the market can it continue to grow, allowing large enterprises to secure financing and capital to circulate efficiently. Practices such as "fleecing" retail investors, market cap manipulation, and financial traps exist in the US market as well; however, as a mature market, it relies on a century of institutional evolution, collective litigation, and massive fines to drive the cost of misconduct to extreme levels, resulting in relatively fewer instances of market disorder.
Recognizing these structural differences is not about complaining, but about adjusting one's survival strategy. Investors must acknowledge the long-standing nature of the A-share market's primary function as a financing vehicle and abandon the fantasy that the market will "look out for" retail investors; risk management, stock selection, and market timing must rely on one's own capabilities. One should avoid companies that rely solely on "storytelling," engage in repeated fundraising, or suffer from chaotic governance, prioritizing instead targets with financial transparency, stable dividends, and solid core businesses. While accepting that the market may be unfair at times, investors should avoid being swayed by emotion; systems are evolving and the market ecosystem is improving, even if the process is gradual. In the current market environment, staying away from crowded trades and bloated, illiquid stocks—and protecting oneself through rules and data—is far more reliable than counting on external protection. The origins, underlying DNA, and development paths of the Chinese and US stock markets differ fundamentally—an objective reality shaped by history and national conditions: in China, the political framework preceded the stock market, whereas in the US, the stock market predated the political framework. The A-share market originated with the goal of financing the real economy, with investor protection emerging only later to address a previously neglected area; in contrast, the US stock market began with private trading, and its rules were built around the principles of trust and fairness. For the average trader, truly understanding the rules, adapting to the market environment, and preserving one's capital are the fundamentals for long-term survival in the market.

In the two-way forex trading system, investors adhering to long-term strategies should avoid currency pairs favored by short-term traders—specifically major pairs such as EUR/USD, GBP/USD, and USD/JPY.

---

The vast majority of retail traders in the market operate primarily on a short-term basis. These popular currency pairs are constantly saturated with short-term speculative capital; they lack the stable, large-scale capital accumulation associated with long-term holdings and the fundamental basis for sustained trend extension. Consequently, they are entirely incompatible with the logic of long-term forex trading, which relies on extended holding periods and profits derived from major, long-term trends.
In contrast, within the stock market, high-quality stocks capable of launching sustained, major upward rallies often exhibit a consistent core characteristic prior to the move: a high concentration of tradable shares held by a select few, with the number of shareholders at historically low levels. The tradable shares of such stocks are typically locked up by institutional "smart money" and specialized long-term funds. With extremely limited floating supply and minimal resistance to price appreciation, these stocks do not require massive capital to absorb selling pressure, making it easier to initiate powerful, sustained rallies with significant upside potential. Conversely, underperforming stocks characterized by weak, declining trends often suffer from a common issue: overcrowding by retail investors. These stocks typically attract significant market hype and maintain high shareholder counts—often involving hundreds of thousands or even over a million individual holders—resulting in a highly fragmented distribution of tradable shares. Institutional capital is unwilling to step in and drive the price higher because doing so effectively boosts the returns of a massive retail investor base; even a slight rise in price triggers a flood of selling from profit-takers and investors looking to exit trapped positions, creating persistent downward pressure on the stock price. At the same time, a prevalent mindset among retail investors—characterized by a refusal to cut losses and a tendency to stubbornly hold onto positions—prevents the effective exchange of shares and drains market turnover momentum. This traps stock prices in a weak pattern of prolonged sideways oscillation and persistent, slow decline, ultimately creating a vicious cycle where retail investors compete against one another and continuously deplete their capital.
The stock market is inherently a zero-sum game; the fundamental logic of trading rules makes it difficult for the vast majority of participants to achieve consistent profits. Sustained upward price movement essentially represents a process where a minority of capital holders profit at the expense of the majority of ordinary investors. The concentration of shares—meaning that tradable shares are held by a small number of professional or long-term investors—is crucial; only when there is a consensus among capital holders and a unified force driving the price up can a sustained bull market emerge. Conversely, a market state characterized by highly dispersed share ownership implies that a vast number of retail investors are holding positions without sufficient new capital entering to lift prices. With supply and demand persistently out of balance, the stock price inevitably falls into a weak trend of prolonged sideways movement, slow decline, and repeated bottoming-out. From the perspective of trading dynamics, the primary counterparty for a retail investor is not the "smart money" or institutional players, but rather the large cohort of ordinary retail investors who refuse to stop losses and stubbornly hold their positions. This massive clustering of retail holdings erodes the capital foundation and share-ownership structure required for price appreciation, severely constraining the upside potential of the stock.
Based on this core market logic, the number of shareholders should serve as a key criterion when selecting stocks. Investors should prioritize targets where the number of shareholders is steadily declining and currently sits at a historical low, while resolutely avoiding popular large-cap stocks characterized by a rising number of retail investors and persistently high shareholder counts. Furthermore, one should steer clear of "cult stocks" (stocks with a fanatical following), low-priced large-cap blue chips, and "viral" stocks experiencing short-term hype. These stocks attract large numbers of retail investors due to high market visibility and serve as major hubs for retail capital; their share-ownership structures remain loose and chaotic over the long term, making it highly unlikely for them to generate the kind of long-term, multi-bagger returns seen in successful growth stocks. A fundamental cognitive error among retail investors is the assumption that higher market participation and a larger number of buyers equate to greater investment safety. However, given the zero-sum nature of the stock market, "hot" sectors and individual stocks characterized by crowded trades and a concentration of retail investors often present the highest risk and the greatest difficulty in achieving profitability. It is important to note that the number of shareholders is not the sole criterion for stock selection; rather, it serves as a key threshold for screening out potential pitfalls. In actual trading, one must conduct a comprehensive assessment based on multiple dimensions—such as the stock's current price level, the growth prospects of its industry, and the quality of the listed company's fundamentals. Using this indicator for an initial screen allows investors to effectively avoid poor-quality stocks prone to prolonged, sluggish declines and sustained weakness, thereby significantly reducing the likelihood of investment losses.

In the two-way arena of leveraged forex trading, there exists a subtle form of attrition often overlooked by most traders: the gradual erosion of mental fortitude caused by frequent stop-loss executions.

---

As stop-loss orders trigger repeatedly and the account's net value slowly bleeds away through these constant setbacks, the trader's initial sharpness and decisiveness begin to dull imperceptibly. This deterioration does not happen overnight; it is akin to being cut by a dull blade. Each minor loss adds an invisible psychological burden, and over time, one's fighting spirit is worn down, causing courage to dissipate.
This erosion of mental resolve mirrors the loss of spirit often experienced in life after enduring repeated hardships. Faced with recurring setbacks, one might initially maintain a high fighting spirit; however, as failure becomes the norm, that drive gradually drains away through constant attrition. Self-confidence crumbles like an embankment repeatedly battered by the tide, while once-clear market intuition becomes shrouded in layers of self-doubt, ultimately shackling one's innate talent and ability. Traders often drift from an initial, confident assessment of market trends toward deep self-doubt, eventually forced to accept a more mediocre self-image; the skills they once wielded with ease now feel constrained and difficult to execute.
Even more dangerous is the way prolonged, unreleased negative emotions transform a trader's psychological state: initial anxiety gradually gives way to a state of numb, repressed detachment. In this condition, sensitivity to market signals declines, a healthy respect for risk morphs into paralyzing fear, and the ability to seize opportunities is replaced by hesitation. At such times, having someone with whom one can speak candidly—whether a close family member or a like-minded confidant—acts as a floodgate, allowing pent-up emotions to pour out. Confiding in others is not a sign of weakness; rather, it is an essential mechanism for professional traders to maintain psychological stability under high-pressure conditions. Only when the internal burden is lifted can one's suppressed spirit flow freely again, enabling the trader to extricate themselves from a mental quagmire and re-examine both the market and themselves.
In the world of forex trading, "sharpness" is essentially a form of deep-seated confidence—an inner conviction regarding one's own trading system and the underlying laws of the market. When one's mindset is clear and unencumbered, perception is sharp and execution decisive, allowing skills and talent to be fully realized in the market; conversely, when that spirit is blocked or stifled, even the most skilled trader may falter or lose their form at critical moments. Learning to proactively channel emotions and find a safe outlet for expression is not merely a matter of personal character; it is a core competency for professional traders seeking to safeguard their competitive edge and maintain consistent, long-term performance.
For this reason, excessively frequent stop-loss actions—particularly the repetitive trial-and-error seen in high-frequency, short-term trading where moves are measured in minutes or even seconds—can be devastating to a trader's psychological capital. Such practices do not merely test a strategy; they continuously deplete a person's most precious mental resources. This constitutes the most significant psychological argument against adopting high-frequency, short-term trading as a primary strategy: when stop-loss measures cease to be tools for risk management and instead become a source of constant mental attrition, traders inevitably lose the sharp edge and courage essential for survival and profitability in the market. A trader lacking that edge cannot make decisive moves amidst the volatile and unpredictable fluctuations of the forex market; one devoid of courage is even less likely to go against the grain at critical moments or capture the gains offered by genuine market trends. The depletion of one's mental resolve is far more fatal than financial losses in the trading account.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---